PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIKX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIKX achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than SSBRX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIKX has outperformed SSBRX with an annualized return of 12.60%, while SSBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.


DRIKX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.02%
YTD
12.38%
6M
13.14%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
12.60%

SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.38%19.29%17.19%21.26%-15.32%21.28%14.20%25.63%-9.16%21.59%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.74%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIKX and SSBRX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.93

The correlation between DRIKX and SSBRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIKX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIKX
DRIKX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DRIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRIKXSSBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.58

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.58

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

16.33

-0.29

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIKX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRIKXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.91

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.62

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.81

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.74

+0.07

Drawdowns

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIKX drawdown since its inception was -33.48%, which is greater than SSBRX's maximum drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIKX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIKXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.48%

-21.96%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-4.44%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

-7.48%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.49%

-21.13%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

-21.96%

-11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-3.72%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

0.97%

+0.92%

Volatility

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) at 1.74%. This indicates that DRIKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIKXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

1.74%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

4.36%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

5.48%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

8.83%

+6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

9.82%

+5.93%

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIKX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIKX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

DRIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than SSBRX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIKX
Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.31%1.24%2.44%3.19%3.92%2.37%2.41%2.12%2.27%1.18%1.39%0.00%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.68%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIKX and SSBRX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIKX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIKX dropped -33.48% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIKX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer