DRGTX vs. FIKHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX).

DRGTX is managed by Allianz. It was launched on Dec 26, 1995. FIKHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

DRGTX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DRGTX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRGTX Virtus Technology Fund	-10.77%	25.10%	35.67%	65.59%	-42.58%	12.14%	70.02%	29.46%	-12.57%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%

Returns By Period

DRGTX

• 1D: 4.59%
• 1M: -6.34%
• YTD: -10.77%
• 6M: -9.41%
• 1Y: 29.10%
• 3Y*: 26.09%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 19.41%

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRGTX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGTX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

DRGTX

Virtus Technology Fund

FIKHX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

DRGTX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRGTX

DRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
DRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
DRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
DRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRGTX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between DRGTX and FIKHX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DRGTX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

DRGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than FIKHX's 9.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRGTX Virtus Technology Fund	2.81%	2.51%	0.00%	0.00%	18.86%	28.27%	16.84%	17.12%	21.77%	16.26%	5.15%	15.96%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.15%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.10%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.29%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.45%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	—	—