DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO
DRFD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and FCRI.TO (Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DRFD.TO returned 26.87% vs 28.33% for FCRI.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRFD.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than FCRI.TO's 10.79% return.
DRFD.TO
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- —
FCRI.TO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRFD.TO Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 12.55% | 12.68% |
FCRI.TO Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series | 10.79% | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRFD.TO and FCRI.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DRFD.TO
FCRI.TO
DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO) and Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series (FCRI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRFD.TO | FCRI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.79 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.52 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 10.19 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRFD.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, which is greater than FCRI.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRFD.TO and FCRI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRFD.TO | FCRI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.18% | -11.34% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -11.34% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -2.14% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -1.49% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.80% | +0.23% |
Volatility
DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series (FCRI.TO) at 2.98%. This indicates that DRFD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCRI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRFD.TO | FCRI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.98% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 11.72% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 14.03% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 13.94% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 13.94% | -0.27% |
Dividends
DRFD.TO vs. FCRI.TO - Dividend Comparison
DRFD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than FCRI.TO's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRFD.TO Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 2.36% | 2.68% | 2.55% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.72% |
FCRI.TO Franklin International Core Equity Fund ETF Series | 2.54% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRFD.TO and FCRI.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and Franklin Templeton.
Find the right allocation for DRFD.TO and FCRI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer