PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DRFD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and FCIV.TO (Fidelity International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DRFD.TO is actively managed, while FCIV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRFD.TO returned 11.86%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for FCIV.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO) and Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRFD.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly lower than FCIV.TO's 18.43% return.

DRFD.TO

1D
1.07%
1M
2.79%
6M
9.84%
YTD
12.55%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
—

FCIV.TO

1D
0.90%
1M
3.02%
6M
12.22%
YTD
18.43%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
16.30%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRFD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.55%30.23%16.52%12.80%-10.88%9.94%8.86%
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF		18.43%33.60%6.89%22.75%-0.22%14.15%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DRFD.TO and FCIV.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020

0.27

Over the past year, DRFD.TO and FCIV.TO have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Fidelity International Value ETF

Often compared with FCIV.TO:
FCIV.TO vs. FCIM.NEOFCIV.TO vs. VIDY.TOFCIV.TO vs. VI.TOFCIV.TO vs. FCID.TOFCIV.TO vs. VIU.TOFCIV.TO vs. XFN.TOFCIV.TO vs. VA.TO

Return for Risk

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRFD.TO
DRFD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DRFD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO
FCIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO) and Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRFD.TOFCIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.88
2.37

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.74
3.14

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

4.06

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

15.22

-6.33

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRFD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRFD.TO and FCIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRFD.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FCIV.TO drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRFD.TO and FCIV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRFD.TOFCIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.18%

-24.27%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-8.59%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-16.59%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.31%

-24.27%

+1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.65%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-4.04%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.29%

+0.74%

Volatility

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) at 3.11%. This indicates that DRFD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRFD.TOFCIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.11%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

11.29%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

14.73%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

15.24%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

15.49%

-1.82%

Dividends

DRFD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRFD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than FCIV.TO's 2.11% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRFD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		2.36%2.68%2.55%2.17%2.74%2.38%2.55%2.34%0.72%
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF		2.11%2.09%2.80%3.64%3.45%2.97%0.90%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRFD.TO and FCIV.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRFD.TO and FCIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer