DRESX vs. MDOEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRESX (Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund) and MDOEX (Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, DRESX returned 9.10%/yr vs -2.02%/yr for MDOEX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRESX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MDOEX.

Performance

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) and Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRESX achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than MDOEX's 18.37% return.

DRESX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: 20.11%
• 6M: 21.52%
• 1Y: 41.84%
• 3Y*: 22.01%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: 11.53%

MDOEX

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 18.37%
• 6M: 17.83%
• 1Y: 17.72%
• 3Y*: 14.92%
• 5Y*: -2.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	20.11%	24.08%	14.86%	10.30%	-21.17%	15.93%	27.36%
MDOEX Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio	18.37%	8.28%	16.79%	5.36%	-30.36%	-18.69%	45.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DRESX and MDOEX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020	0.71

The correlation between DRESX and MDOEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRESX vs. MDOEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRESX

DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 81
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

MDOEX

MDOEX Risk / Return Rank: 9
MDOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MDOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MDOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MDOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MDOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) and Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRESX	MDOEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	0.80	+2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	1.26	+2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.17	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.22	0.80	+3.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.96	2.18	+11.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRESX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the MDOEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRESX and MDOEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRESX	MDOEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	0.80	+2.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	-0.09	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.17	+0.42

Drawdowns

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRESX drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, smaller than the maximum MDOEX drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRESX and MDOEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRESX	MDOEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.38%	-59.92%	+26.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-21.82%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.65%	-21.82%	+4.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.88%	-52.60%	+26.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.25%	-25.12%	+19.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-35.05%	+25.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	7.96%	-4.90%

Volatility

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) is 6.11%, while Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that DRESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRESX	MDOEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	10.86%	-4.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	19.16%	-6.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	21.75%	-6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	23.58%	-8.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.90%	24.80%	-8.90%

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRESX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MDOEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRESX vs. MDOEX - Dividend Comparison

DRESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than MDOEX's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DRESX Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund	1.87%	2.25%	0.68%	1.09%	0.00%	0.04%	0.65%	0.41%
MDOEX Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio	0.62%	0.74%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRESX and MDOEX in my portfolio?

DRESX and MDOEX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRESX or MDOEX?

MDOEX has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to DRESX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRESX dropped -33.38% vs MDOEX's -59.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.