PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRDIX vs. TANDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRDIX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.18% return.


DRDIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
-2.15%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
9.96%

TANDX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
-13.18%
6M
-13.13%
1Y
-15.71%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DRDIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund
-0.45%2.36%18.69%13.77%-11.52%24.46%10.50%16.78%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
-13.18%3.67%7.66%8.42%-7.87%19.03%13.39%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DRDIX and TANDX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.90

The correlation between DRDIX and TANDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRDIX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRDIX
DRDIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DRDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DRDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TANDX
TANDX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TANDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TANDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TANDX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
TANDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TANDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRDIXTANDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.74

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.98

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

-2.30

+1.81

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRDIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the TANDX Sharpe Ratio of -1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRDIX and TANDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRDIXTANDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

-1.70

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.00

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.01

+0.63

Drawdowns

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRDIX drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRDIX and TANDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRDIXTANDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-93.93%

+62.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-16.13%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-93.93%

+81.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.45%

-93.93%

+74.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

-93.93%

+88.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-20.25%

+16.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

6.85%

-3.18%

Volatility

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) is 2.13%, while Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that DRDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRDIXTANDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

2.52%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

7.18%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.05%

9.26%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

595.57%

-581.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

496.55%

-480.88%

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRDIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRDIX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison

DRDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than TANDX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRDIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund
3.64%3.55%11.15%0.80%1.88%2.49%1.21%1.47%1.55%1.74%1.11%1.53%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
7.11%6.17%3.71%2.10%1.48%4.57%0.33%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRDIX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TANDX has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to DRDIX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRDIX dropped -31.36% vs TANDX's -93.93%.

DRDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRDIX and TANDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer