DRCVX vs. RYCLX
DRCVX (Comstock Capital Value Fund) and RYCLX (Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DRCVX returned -3.71%/yr vs -10.90%/yr for RYCLX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRCVX charges 0.00%/yr vs 2.39%/yr for RYCLX.
Performance
DRCVX vs. RYCLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRCVX achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than RYCLX's -11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, DRCVX has outperformed RYCLX with an annualized return of -3.71%, while RYCLX has yielded a comparatively lower -10.90% annualized return.
DRCVX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 7.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- -3.71%
RYCLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -11.81%
- 1Y
- -12.91%
- 3Y*
- -6.67%
- 5Y*
- -6.09%
- 10Y*
- -10.90%
DRCVX vs. RYCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 3.85% | 11.55% | 2.02% | 6.55% | 4.13% | -2.16% | -5.36% | -25.76% | 7.76% | -20.58% |
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | -11.81% | -1.04% | -5.59% | -8.75% | 8.93% | -24.21% | -25.53% | -21.03% | 11.39% | -14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRCVX and RYCLX is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.57 |
The correlation between DRCVX and RYCLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRCVX vs. RYCLX — Risk / Return Rank
DRCVX
RYCLX
DRCVX vs. RYCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) and Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRCVX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 0.87 | +0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.83 | -0.72 | +9.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.03 | -1.37 | +33.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRCVX vs. RYCLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRCVX drawdown since its inception was -97.47%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCLX drawdown of -95.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRCVX and RYCLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRCVX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.47% | -95.66% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.89% | -18.50% | +17.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | -32.43% | +28.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.08% | -34.96% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.64% | -71.12% | +21.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.59% | -95.54% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.97% | -70.31% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 9.76% | -9.51% |
Volatility
DRCVX vs. RYCLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) is 0.86%, while Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that DRCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRCVX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 3.73% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | 11.75% | -9.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 15.86% | -13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 20.55% | -15.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 21.41% | -11.97% |
DRCVX vs. RYCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRCVX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCLX's 2.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRCVX vs. RYCLX - Dividend Comparison
DRCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than RYCLX's 37.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 1.89% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | 37.43% | 33.01% | 25.75% | 9.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRCVX and RYCLX have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYCLX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to DRCVX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRCVX dropped -97.47% vs RYCLX's -95.66%.
DRCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRCVX and RYCLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer