PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DRCU.TO (Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and DRMD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRCU.TO is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Desjardins, while DRMD.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Desjardins. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRCU.TO returned 0.58%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for DRMD.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRCU.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRCU.TO achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than DRMD.TO's 12.40% return.

DRCU.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.75%
6M
0.76%
YTD
0.39%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
—

DRMD.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
0.89%
6M
7.82%
YTD
12.40%
1Y
24.44%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRCU.TO
Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		0.39%3.11%5.29%6.29%-11.24%-3.01%4.32%
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.40%27.57%11.54%13.94%-8.20%9.85%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DRCU.TO and DRMD.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020

0.11

The correlation between DRCU.TO and DRMD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Return for Risk

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRCU.TO
DRCU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DRCU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO
DRMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRCU.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRCU.TODRMD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.84
1.80

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.19
2.51

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.11

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

8.44

-4.92

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRCU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRCU.TO and DRMD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRCU.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.29%, smaller than the maximum DRMD.TO drawdown of -23.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRCU.TO and DRMD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRCU.TODRMD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-23.39%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-11.65%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.71%

-14.40%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-23.39%

+7.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-2.32%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-4.02%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.90%

-1.88%

Volatility

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRCU.TO) is 1.03%, while Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that DRCU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRMD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRCU.TODRMD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

3.24%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

11.24%

-8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

13.66%

-9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.51%

13.87%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.72%

13.88%

-6.16%

Dividends

DRCU.TO vs. DRMD.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRCU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while DRMD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRCU.TO
Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		3.43%3.43%3.27%2.62%3.34%2.87%2.69%2.67%0.71%
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		0.00%0.00%12.27%1.86%2.45%2.04%1.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRCU.TO and DRMD.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRCU.TO is categorized as Sustainable, while DRMD.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRCU.TO and DRMD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer