DRAY vs. PEPS
DRAY (YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DRAY returned -42.41% vs 26.06% for PEPS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRAY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
DRAY vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRAY achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 11.26% return.
DRAY
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -9.99%
- 6M
- -27.98%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 1Y
- -42.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAY vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRAY YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF | -28.70% | -19.48% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 11.26% | 12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAY and PEPS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAY vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
DRAY
PEPS
DRAY vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.34 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 2.67 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 11.80 | -12.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAY vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAY drawdown since its inception was -57.87%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAY and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.87% | -21.26% | -36.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.87% | -9.80% | -48.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.25% | 0.00% | -48.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -2.70% | -30.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.71% | 2.21% | +35.50% |
Volatility
DRAY vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) at 3.83%. This indicates that DRAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.35% | 3.83% | +10.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.35% | 10.88% | +23.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.33% | 13.83% | +28.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.33% | 18.17% | +24.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.33% | 18.17% | +24.16% |
DRAY vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAY vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
DRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.99%, more than PEPS's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DRAY YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.99% | 32.48% | 0.00% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.92% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAY and PEPS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRAY has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to PEPS (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRAY dropped -57.87% vs PEPS's -21.26%.
On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 26.06% vs -42.41% for DRAY. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 26.06% return vs -42.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRAY.
DRAY has the higher dividend yield at 101.99%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DRAY and 0.10% for PEPS.
PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRAY and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer