DRAY vs. FTQI
DRAY (YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. DRAY is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRAY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
DRAY vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRAY achieves a -30.74% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 10.52% return.
DRAY
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -30.74%
- 6M
- -30.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
DRAY vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRAY YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF | -30.74% | -19.48% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.52% | 12.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAY and FTQI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAY vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
DRAY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTQI
DRAY vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAY vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAY drawdown since its inception was -57.87%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAY and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.87% | -19.42% | -38.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.73% | -1.09% | -48.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -3.74% | -28.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility
DRAY vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.82% | 10.62% | +31.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.82% | 14.83% | +26.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.82% | 13.32% | +28.50% |
DRAY vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAY vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
DRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 98.00%, more than FTQI's 12.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAY YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF | 98.00% | 32.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 12.00% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAY and FTQI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRAY.
DRAY has the higher dividend yield at 98.00%, compared with 12.00% for FTQI.
DRAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DRAY and 0.75% for FTQI.
Find the right allocation for DRAY and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer