PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAG vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAG vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHAT

1D
-0.66%
1M
27.78%
YTD
74.30%
6M
73.13%
1Y
144.01%
3Y*
55.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


DRAG vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAG
CHAT

Consumer Cyclical

72.4%
5.6%

Communication Services

17.3%
16.6%

Technology

10.2%
76.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

DRAG
72.4%
CHAT
5.6%

Communication Services

DRAG
17.3%
CHAT
16.6%

Technology

DRAG
10.2%
CHAT
76.5%

Basic Materials

DRAG

-

CHAT

-

Consumer Defensive

DRAG

-

CHAT

-

Energy

DRAG

-

CHAT

-

Financial Services

DRAG

-

CHAT
0.0%

Healthcare

DRAG

-

CHAT

-

Industrials

DRAG

-

CHAT
0.8%

Real Estate

DRAG

-

CHAT

-

Utilities

DRAG

-

CHAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAG vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAG

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAG vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAG vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRAGCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAGCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-31.34%

+31.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.66%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.35%

+5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

Volatility

DRAG vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAGCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

30.74%

-30.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

29.90%

-29.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

29.90%

-29.90%

DRAG vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAG vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.

DRAG is categorized as China Equities, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.75% for CHAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAG and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer