DRAG vs. CHAT
DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAG is a China Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. DRAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
DRAG vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAG vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 69.11% |
DRAG vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRAG
CHAT
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
DRAG
CHAT
Communication Services
DRAG
CHAT
Technology
DRAG
CHAT
Basic Materials
DRAG
-
CHAT
-
Consumer Defensive
DRAG
-
CHAT
-
Energy
DRAG
-
CHAT
-
Financial Services
DRAG
-
CHAT
Healthcare
DRAG
-
CHAT
-
Industrials
DRAG
-
CHAT
Real Estate
DRAG
-
CHAT
-
Utilities
DRAG
-
CHAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAG vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
DRAG
CHAT
DRAG vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRAG | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.98 | — |
Drawdowns
DRAG vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAG | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -31.34% | +31.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.66% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.35% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility
DRAG vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAG | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 30.74% | -30.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 29.90% | -29.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 29.90% | -29.90% |
DRAG vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAG vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% |
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.
DRAG is categorized as China Equities, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.75% for CHAT.
Find the right allocation for DRAG and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer