DRAG vs. CGRO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) and CGRO (CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. DRAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CGRO.

Performance

DRAG vs. CGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGRO

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -6.61%
• YTD: -15.64%
• 6M: -16.66%
• 1Y: -12.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. CGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	-14.64%

DRAG vs. CGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRAG	CGRO
Consumer Cyclical	72.4%	43.9%
Communication Services	17.3%	13.3%
Technology	10.2%	14.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	2.3%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Healthcare	-	5.7%
Industrials	-	15.6%
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DRAG vs. CGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGRO

CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAG vs. CGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRAG	CGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.23	—

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. CGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CGRO drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and CGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAG	CGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-27.90%	+27.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-27.90%	+27.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-10.25%	+10.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAG	CGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	22.47%	-22.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	28.97%	-28.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	28.97%	-28.97%

DRAG vs. CGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CGRO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAG vs. CGRO - Dividend Comparison

DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	3.32%	2.48%	2.47%	0.21%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DRAG or CGRO?

On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAG or CGRO?

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAG or CGRO?

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.

What is the main difference between DRAG and CGRO?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and CoreValues Alpha. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.75% for CGRO.