PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPYA.L vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPYA.L achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.33% return.


DPYA.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
6.77%
6M
7.84%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*

SPY

1D
0.38%
1M
4.60%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.25%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DPYA.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.77%9.25%-0.10%9.70%-24.03%25.35%-9.35%21.05%-4.06%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
11.33%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DPYA.L and SPY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.38

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DPYA.L
SPY

Real Estate

100.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

0.1%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
10.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.6%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Technology

-

35.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Real Estate

DPYA.L
100.0%
SPY
1.9%

Financial Services

DPYA.L
0.1%
SPY
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DPYA.L
0.0%
SPY
10.3%

Basic Materials

DPYA.L

-

SPY
1.8%

Communication Services

DPYA.L

-

SPY
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

DPYA.L

-

SPY
4.8%

Energy

DPYA.L

-

SPY
3.6%

Healthcare

DPYA.L

-

SPY
8.4%

Industrials

DPYA.L

-

SPY
7.8%

Technology

DPYA.L

-

SPY
35.9%

Utilities

DPYA.L

-

SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPYA.L vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPYA.L
DPYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DPYA.LSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.44

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

3.22

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

14.99

-11.33

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPYA.L and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DPYA.LSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.42

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.82

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.59

-0.42

Drawdowns

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPYA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPYA.L and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPYA.LSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.96%

-55.19%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-8.88%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-18.76%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.79%

-24.50%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-0.33%

-3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-9.05%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.91%

+0.99%

Volatility

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.79%. This indicates that DPYA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPYA.LSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

2.79%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

8.91%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

11.82%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.05%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

17.93%

+0.32%

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPYA.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPYA.L vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

DPYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPYA.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


DPYA.L and SPY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DPYA.L.

DPYA.L is categorized as REIT, while SPY is S&P 500. DPYA.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DPYA.L and 0.09% for SPY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPYA.L and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer