PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DPYA.L vs. REET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DPYA.L vs. REET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DPYA.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both REIT funds from iShares - DPYA.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while REET tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DPYA.L returned 0.70%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for REET. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DPYA.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.

Performance

DPYA.L vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPYA.L achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 9.19% return.

DPYA.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
6.77%
6M
7.84%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
—

REET

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
9.19%
6M
9.33%
1Y
13.23%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
4.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPYA.L vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DPYA.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		6.77%9.25%-0.10%9.70%-24.03%25.35%-9.35%21.05%-4.06%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF		9.19%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DPYA.L and REET is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.62

The correlation between DPYA.L and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

DPYA.L vs. REET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DPYA.L
REET

Real Estate

100.0%
99.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

DPYA.L
100.0%
REET
99.8%

Financial Services

DPYA.L
0.1%
REET
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DPYA.L
0.0%
REET

-

Basic Materials

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Communication Services

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Consumer Defensive

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Energy

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Healthcare

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Industrials

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Technology

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Utilities

DPYA.L

-

REET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares Global REIT ETF

Often compared with DPYA.L:
DPYA.L vs. VNQDPYA.L vs. CSPX.LDPYA.L vs. SCHHDPYA.L vs. XLREDPYA.L vs. ISAC.LDPYA.L vs. VWRA.LDPYA.L vs. VOO
Often compared with REET:
REET vs. VNQREET vs. VNQIREET vs. XLREREET vs. USRTREET vs. SCHHREET vs. RWOREET vs. FREL

Return for Risk

DPYA.L vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DPYA.L
DPYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPYA.L vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DPYA.LREETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.88
1.10

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.34
1.55

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.47

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

5.28

-1.62

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DPYA.L vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the REET Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPYA.L and REET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DPYA.LREETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.10

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.14

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.22

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.25

-0.08

Drawdowns

DPYA.L vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPYA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, roughly equal to the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPYA.L and REET.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DPYA.LREETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.96%

-44.59%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-9.04%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-18.02%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.79%

-32.11%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.59%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-1.81%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-9.78%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.51%

+0.39%

Volatility

DPYA.L vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) is 3.57%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that DPYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DPYA.LREETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.90%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

8.86%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

12.12%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

16.96%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

18.84%

-0.59%

DPYA.L vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPYA.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

DPYA.L vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

DPYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPYA.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF		3.39%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

DPYA.L and REET have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DPYA.L.

DPYA.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DPYA.L and 0.14% for REET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPYA.L and REET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer