DPYA.L vs. AREG.L
DPYA.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AREG.L (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. DPYA.L is passively managed, while AREG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, DPYA.L returned 10.62% vs 7.92% for AREG.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DPYA.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AREG.L.
Performance
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DPYA.L is traded in USD, while AREG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AREG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPYA.L achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly higher than AREG.L's 4.70% return.
DPYA.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
AREG.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 7.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DPYA.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.77% | 9.25% | 6.82% |
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 4.70% | 8.05% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPYA.L and AREG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DPYA.L and AREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L — Risk / Return Rank
DPYA.L
AREG.L
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DPYA.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.71 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 2.44 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPYA.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.64 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.57 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPYA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, which is greater than AREG.L's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPYA.L and AREG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPYA.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.96% | -20.06% | -22.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -11.08% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -5.48% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.39% | -5.36% | -7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.24% | -0.34% |
Volatility
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) is 3.57%, while abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that DPYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPYA.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.78% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 9.63% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 12.25% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 13.96% | +2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 13.96% | +4.29% |
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPYA.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AREG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPYA.L vs. AREG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DPYA.L nor AREG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DPYA.L and AREG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AREG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AREG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DPYA.L.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DPYA.L and 0.40% for AREG.L.
Find the right allocation for DPYA.L and AREG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer