DPST vs. CRMU
DPST (Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - DPST tracks the Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%) while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DPST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.
Performance
DPST vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DPST
- 1D
- 8.17%
- 1M
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 36.47%
- YTD
- 57.62%
- 1Y
- 66.24%
- 3Y*
- 36.52%
- 5Y*
- -13.46%
- 10Y*
- -11.04%
CRMU
- 1D
- -20.34%
- 1M
- -54.63%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DPST vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DPST Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares | 11.77% |
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -83.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPST and CRMU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPST vs. CRMU — Risk / Return Rank
DPST
CRMU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DPST vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DPST | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DPST vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than CRMU's maximum drawdown of -83.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and CRMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPST | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.73% | -83.97% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.35% | -83.97% | -6.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -50.24% | -14.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.13% | — | — |
Volatility
DPST vs. CRMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPST | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.32% | 235.27% | -166.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.67% | 235.27% | -146.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.18% | 235.27% | -141.09% |
DPST vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPST vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison
DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DPST Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares | 1.39% | 2.18% | 1.55% | 1.78% | 1.51% | 0.58% | 0.90% | 1.29% | 2.18% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DPST and CRMU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DPST.
DPST has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.
DPST tracks Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%), while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 0.75% for CRMU.
Find the right allocation for DPST and CRMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer