DPM.TO vs. MSFT
DPM.TO (Dundee Precious Metals Inc.) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. DPM.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DPM.TO returned 31.40%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DPM.TO is traded in CAD, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPM.TO achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -17.20% return. Over the past 10 years, DPM.TO has outperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 31.40%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively lower 25.46% annualized return.
DPM.TO
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 110.63%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 42.19%
- 10Y*
- 31.40%
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -17.20%
- 6M
- -16.81%
- 1Y
- -14.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 25.46%
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 5.36% | 228.15% | 56.69% | 33.46% | -14.25% | -13.18% | 66.57% | 55.00% | 20.00% | 33.33% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -17.20% | 10.31% | 22.49% | 54.43% | -23.46% | 52.40% | 39.15% | 51.06% | 30.95% | 31.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPM.TO and MSFT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
DPM.TO:
CA$9.88B
MSFT:
$2.91T
DPM.TO:
$2.55
MSFT:
$16.79
DPM.TO:
12.50
MSFT:
23.27
DPM.TO:
0.13
MSFT:
1.63
DPM.TO:
5.89
MSFT:
9.16
DPM.TO:
2.61
MSFT:
7.02
DPM.TO:
$1.07B
MSFT:
$318.27B
DPM.TO:
$647.81M
MSFT:
$217.41B
DPM.TO:
$688.93M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPM.TO vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
DPM.TO
MSFT
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DPM.TO | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.90 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | -0.46 | +4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | -0.92 | +11.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPM.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -44.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPM.TO and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPM.TO | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.18% | -44.28% | -48.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.44% | -34.57% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.44% | -34.57% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -34.57% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.96% | -34.57% | -17.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.73% | -27.56% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.19% | -10.49% | -36.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.41% | 17.37% | -5.96% |
Volatility
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.20% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.33%. This indicates that DPM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPM.TO | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.20% | 10.33% | +8.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.82% | 22.17% | +17.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.25% | 25.31% | +21.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.86% | 27.34% | +11.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.33% | 28.00% | +19.33% |
Dividends
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
DPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than MSFT's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPM.TO Dundee Precious Metals Inc. | 0.49% | 0.52% | 1.69% | 2.52% | 2.90% | 1.53% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dundee Precious Metals Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DPM.TO vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
DPM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 223.10M and revenue of 310.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
DPM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 183.99M and revenue of 310.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.3%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
DPM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a net income of 165.91M and revenue of 310.36M, resulting in a net margin of 53.5%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DPM.TO and MSFT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DPM.TO and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer