PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPM.TO vs. FJTSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DPM.TO is traded in CAD, while FJTSY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FJTSY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPM.TO achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly higher than FJTSY's -17.86% return. Over the past 10 years, DPM.TO has outperformed FJTSY with an annualized return of 30.81%, while FJTSY has yielded a comparatively lower 20.19% annualized return.


DPM.TO

1D
-2.02%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
3.17%
6M
10.24%
1Y
114.27%
3Y*
68.97%
5Y*
40.96%
10Y*
30.81%

FJTSY

1D
0.23%
1M
4.60%
YTD
-17.86%
6M
-14.32%
1Y
-4.44%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
20.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DPM.TO
Dundee Precious Metals Inc.
3.17%228.15%56.69%33.46%-14.25%-13.18%66.57%55.00%20.00%33.33%
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
-17.86%48.86%27.44%10.08%-17.97%19.12%50.81%43.59%-5.02%20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DPM.TO and FJTSY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.07

The correlation between DPM.TO and FJTSY shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DPM.TO:

CA$9.67B

FJTSY:

$38.24B

EPS

DPM.TO:

CA$2.55

FJTSY:

$257.52

PE Ratio

DPM.TO:

17.11

FJTSY:

0.09

PEG Ratio

DPM.TO:

0.17

FJTSY:

0.00

PS Ratio

DPM.TO:

8.07

FJTSY:

0.01

PB Ratio

DPM.TO:

3.57

FJTSY:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

DPM.TO:

CA$1.07B

FJTSY:

$3.55T

Gross Profit (TTM)

DPM.TO:

CA$647.81M

FJTSY:

$1.32T

EBITDA (TTM)

DPM.TO:

CA$688.93M

FJTSY:

$439.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPM.TO
DPM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DPM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DPM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FJTSY
FJTSY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FJTSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJTSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJTSY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FJTSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJTSY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DPM.TOFJTSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.02

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

-0.13

+4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

-0.29

+10.71

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the FJTSY Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPM.TO and FJTSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DPM.TOFJTSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

-0.10

+2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.25

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.63

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.26

-0.13

Drawdowns

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPM.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, which is greater than FJTSY's maximum drawdown of -54.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPM.TO and FJTSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPM.TOFJTSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.18%

-54.57%

-38.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.52%

-34.94%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.52%

-34.94%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

-43.29%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.96%

-43.29%

-8.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.30%

-23.92%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.17%

-19.71%

-27.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.01%

15.47%

-4.46%

Volatility

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Volatility Comparison

Dundee Precious Metals Inc. (DPM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY) at 14.01%. This indicates that DPM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJTSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPM.TOFJTSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.55%

14.01%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.35%

34.77%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.15%

43.25%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.63%

34.34%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.22%

32.31%

+14.91%

Dividends

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Dividend Comparison

DPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while FJTSY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPM.TO
Dundee Precious Metals Inc.
0.50%0.52%1.69%2.52%2.90%1.53%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
0.00%0.36%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%1.30%1.30%

Financials

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dundee Precious Metals Inc. and Fujitsu Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
310.36M
1.07T
(DPM.TO) Total Revenue
(FJTSY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DPM.TO values in CAD, FJTSY values in USD

DPM.TO vs. FJTSY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dundee Precious Metals Inc. and Fujitsu Ltd ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
71.9%
42.8%
Portfolio components
DPM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 223.10M and revenue of 310.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.

FJTSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 458.88B and revenue of 1.07T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

DPM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 183.99M and revenue of 310.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.3%.

FJTSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 154.67B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

DPM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dundee Precious Metals Inc. reported a net income of 165.91M and revenue of 310.36M, resulting in a net margin of 53.5%.

FJTSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a net income of 107.66B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DPM.TO and FJTSY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPM.TO and FJTSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer