DPLM.L vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Diploma plc (DPLM.L) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Performance
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPLM.L Diploma plc | 13.55% | 26.31% | 20.61% | 31.57% | -16.36% | 54.56% | 9.89% | 70.07% | -1.01% | 22.46% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -8.15% | -3.61% | 24.38% | 28.08% | 15.22% | 27.71% | 28.84% | 55.58% | 15.50% | 24.54% |
Different Trading Currencies
DPLM.L is traded in GBp, while CTAS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CTAS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
DPLM.L:
£8.00B
CTAS:
$68.81B
DPLM.L:
£1.99
CTAS:
$4.75
DPLM.L:
30.04
CTAS:
35.63
DPLM.L:
1.15
CTAS:
2.50
DPLM.L:
2.77
CTAS:
6.26
DPLM.L:
8.08
CTAS:
14.37
DPLM.L:
£2.89B
CTAS:
$11.03B
DPLM.L:
£1.01B
CTAS:
$1.33B
DPLM.L:
£664.70M
CTAS:
$2.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPLM.L achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -8.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DPLM.L having a 25.31% annualized return and CTAS not far behind at 24.52%.
DPLM.L
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 13.34%
- 1Y
- 56.95%
- 3Y*
- 30.41%
- 5Y*
- 19.96%
- 10Y*
- 25.31%
CTAS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -14.25%
- YTD
- -8.15%
- 6M
- -15.79%
- 1Y
- -18.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 16.30%
- 10Y*
- 24.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPLM.L vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
DPLM.L
CTAS
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diploma plc (DPLM.L) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DPLM.L | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | -0.87 | +2.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.25 | -1.16 | +4.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.87 | +0.55 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | -0.70 | +5.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.79 | -1.49 | +16.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPLM.L | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | -0.87 | +2.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.74 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.92 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.78 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between DPLM.L and CTAS is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
DPLM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, which matches CTAS's 1.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPLM.L Diploma plc | 1.04% | 1.14% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 0.37% | 1.37% | 1.43% | 2.11% | 1.84% | 1.92% | 2.39% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPLM.L drawdown since its inception was -81.06%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -44.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPLM.L and CTAS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPLM.L | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.06% | -65.32% | -15.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -26.72% | +14.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.59% | -26.72% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.27% | -48.38% | +9.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -25.20% | +25.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -14.99% | -7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 12.22% | -8.55% |
Volatility
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Diploma plc (DPLM.L) has a higher volatility of 18.36% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 8.10%. This indicates that DPLM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DPLM.L | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.36% | 8.10% | +10.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.10% | 15.12% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.09% | 21.80% | +10.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.74% | 22.12% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 26.60% | +2.83% |
Financials
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diploma plc and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DPLM.L vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
DPLM.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Diploma plc reported a gross profit of 207.05M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.9%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
DPLM.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Diploma plc reported an operating income of 241.00M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
DPLM.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Diploma plc reported a net income of 89.10M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.