DPGT.L vs. PRWU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DPGT.L (Dimensional Global Targeted Value UCITS ETF USD Acc) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds. DPGT.L is actively managed, while PRWU.L is passively managed. DPGT.L charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.

Performance

DPGT.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Targeted Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (DPGT.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DPGT.L is traded in GBP, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

DPGT.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 8.01%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRWU.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPGT.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DPGT.L Dimensional Global Targeted Value UCITS ETF USD Acc	8.01%	-0.48%
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

DPGT.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Targeted Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (DPGT.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DPGT.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DPGT.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DPGT.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.77%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.77%	—	—

DPGT.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPGT.L has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DPGT.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DPGT.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DPGT.L or PRWU.L?

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DPGT.L or PRWU.L?

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for DPGT.L.

What is the main difference between DPGT.L and PRWU.L?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for DPGT.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.