DPDFX vs. TIBDX
DPDFX (Delaware Diversified Income Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, DPDFX returned 2.63%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for TIBDX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DPDFX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
DPDFX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPDFX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than TIBDX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, DPDFX has outperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 2.63%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
DPDFX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.63%
- 10Y*
- 2.63%
TIBDX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
DPDFX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPDFX Delaware Diversified Income Fund | 0.36% | 7.39% | 1.91% | 6.05% | -13.93% | 1.64% | 10.96% | 11.98% | -1.98% | 5.34% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 0.34% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | -0.64% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPDFX and TIBDX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 1999 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DPDFX and TIBDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPDFX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
DPDFX
TIBDX
DPDFX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Diversified Income Fund (DPDFX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DPDFX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.72 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 5.09 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DPDFX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPDFX drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPDFX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPDFX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.64% | -18.82% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -2.98% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.91% | -6.29% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.64% | -18.82% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.64% | -18.82% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.54% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -2.30% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 1.01% | -0.03% |
Volatility
DPDFX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
Delaware Diversified Income Fund (DPDFX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) have volatilities of 1.14% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPDFX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.10% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 2.95% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 3.88% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 5.64% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 4.74% | +0.32% |
DPDFX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPDFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPDFX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
DPDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than TIBDX's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPDFX Delaware Diversified Income Fund | 4.36% | 4.34% | 4.01% | 3.57% | 3.52% | 5.95% | 3.15% | 4.28% | 4.10% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.55% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.46% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DPDFX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DPDFX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to TIBDX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPDFX dropped -18.64% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.
TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DPDFX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer