DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L
DPAG.L (L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF) and QWTM.L (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - DPAG.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while QWTM.L tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DPAG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QWTM.L.
Performance
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPAG.L achieves a -9.59% return, which is significantly lower than QWTM.L's 51.52% return.
DPAG.L
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -9.59%
- 6M
- -8.97%
- 1Y
- -12.88%
- 3Y*
- -1.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QWTM.L
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 20.99%
- YTD
- 51.52%
- 6M
- 41.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DPAG.L L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF | -9.59% | -9.82% |
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 51.52% | 19.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPAG.L and QWTM.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
DPAG.L
QWTM.L
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF (DPAG.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DPAG.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPAG.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | 3.11 | -3.41 |
Drawdowns
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPAG.L drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, which is greater than QWTM.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPAG.L and QWTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPAG.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.44% | -23.74% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.80% | -4.22% | -30.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.06% | -10.21% | -16.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.51% | — | — |
Volatility
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPAG.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 39.18% | -19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 39.18% | -14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 39.18% | -14.92% |
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPAG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QWTM.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPAG.L vs. QWTM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DPAG.L nor QWTM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DPAG.L and QWTM.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DPAG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DPAG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QWTM.L.
DPAG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DPAG.L and 0.50% for QWTM.L.
Find the right allocation for DPAG.L and QWTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer