DON vs. RNIN
DON (WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF) and RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. DON is passively managed, while RNIN is actively managed. Over the past year, DON returned 14.24% vs 28.56% for RNIN. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DON charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for RNIN.
Performance
DON vs. RNIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DON achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than RNIN's 15.93% return.
DON
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
RNIN
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 28.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DON vs. RNIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DON WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF | 7.24% | 5.41% |
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF | 15.93% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DON and RNIN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DON and RNIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DON vs. RNIN — Risk / Return Rank
DON
RNIN
DON vs. RNIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF (DON) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DON | RNIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 5.04 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 17.82 | -12.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DON | RNIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.93 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.78 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
DON vs. RNIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DON drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, which is greater than RNIN's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DON and RNIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DON | RNIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.94% | -5.70% | -56.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -5.70% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -2.55% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -1.24% | -6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.61% | +1.29% |
Volatility
DON vs. RNIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF (DON) is 3.06%, while Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that DON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DON | RNIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 4.94% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 10.50% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 14.87% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 14.97% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 14.97% | +5.29% |
DON vs. RNIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DON has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RNIN's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DON vs. RNIN - Dividend Comparison
DON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than RNIN's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DON WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF | 2.36% | 2.53% | 2.27% | 2.41% | 2.71% | 2.12% | 2.77% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 2.25% | 2.48% | 2.89% |
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF | 0.76% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DON and RNIN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNIN has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to DON (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DON dropped -61.94% vs RNIN's -5.70%.
On 1-year performance, RNIN leads with 28.56% vs 14.24% for DON. On fees, DON is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DON has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RNIN has performed better with a 28.56% return vs 14.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DON is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RNIN.
DON has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.76% for RNIN.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DON and 0.68% for RNIN.
RNIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DON and RNIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer