PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOMO vs. VIK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

DOMO vs. VIK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Domo, Inc. (DOMO) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DOMO vs. VIK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DOMO
Domo, Inc.
-63.70%19.07%-6.47%
VIK
Viking Holdings Ltd
2.90%62.07%68.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DOMO:

$128.73M

VIK:

$32.85B

EPS

DOMO:

-$1.45

VIK:

$2.58

PS Ratio

DOMO:

0.39

VIK:

5.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

DOMO:

$318.86M

VIK:

$6.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DOMO:

$239.12M

VIK:

$2.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

DOMO:

-$30.26M

VIK:

$1.79B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOMO achieves a -63.70% return, which is significantly lower than VIK's 2.90% return.


DOMO

1D
2.68%
1M
-14.76%
YTD
-63.70%
6M
-80.68%
1Y
-60.57%
3Y*
-40.03%
5Y*
-44.41%
10Y*

VIK

1D
7.35%
1M
-5.82%
YTD
2.90%
6M
18.21%
1Y
84.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Domo, Inc.

Viking Holdings Ltd

Return for Risk

DOMO vs. VIK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOMO
DOMO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VIK
VIK Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIK Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIK Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOMO vs. VIK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Domo, Inc. (DOMO) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DOMOVIKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

2.04

-2.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.97

2.71

-3.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.36

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

4.65

-5.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.51

15.01

-16.52

DOMO vs. VIK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOMO Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the VIK Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOMO and VIK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DOMOVIKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

2.04

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

1.81

-2.14

Correlation

The correlation between DOMO and VIK is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DOMO vs. VIK - Dividend Comparison

Neither DOMO nor VIK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DOMO vs. VIK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOMO drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than VIK's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOMO and VIK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DOMOVIKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.95%

-35.39%

-61.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.63%

-18.66%

-64.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.87%

-7.82%

-89.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-6.34%

-52.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.89%

5.78%

+35.11%

Volatility

DOMO vs. VIK - Volatility Comparison

Domo, Inc. (DOMO) has a higher volatility of 27.76% compared to Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) at 17.75%. This indicates that DOMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DOMOVIKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.76%

17.75%

+10.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.45%

28.51%

+32.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.56%

41.75%

+41.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.89%

40.10%

+31.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.52%

40.10%

+34.42%

Financials

DOMO vs. VIK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Domo, Inc. and Viking Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
79.63M
1.72B
(DOMO) Total Revenue
(VIK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DOMO vs. VIK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Domo, Inc. and Viking Holdings Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
76.8%
36.7%
Portfolio components
DOMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Domo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.14M and revenue of 79.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.8%.

VIK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 632.60M and revenue of 1.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

DOMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Domo, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.57M and revenue of 79.63M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.3%.

VIK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 360.56M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

DOMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Domo, Inc. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 79.63M, resulting in a net margin of -10.0%.

VIK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 299.91M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.