DOGG vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. DOGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

DOGG vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DOGG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 15.85%
• 3Y*: 11.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOGG vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	-5.10%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

DOGG vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DOGG	IPDP
Consumer Cyclical	30.1%	3.6%
Healthcare	29.9%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	19.9%	3.9%
Communication Services	10.2%	-
Energy	10.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Financial Services	-	18.6%
Industrials	-	45.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	13.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DOGG vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 40
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOGG vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DOGG	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DOGG	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	—	—

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOGG	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	0.00%	-11.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.62%	0.00%	-7.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	0.00%	-3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DOGG	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	0.00%	+10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.97%	0.00%	+12.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	0.00%	+12.97%

DOGG vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

DOGG vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.90%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DOGG or IPDP?

On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOGG or IPDP?

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOGG or IPDP?

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between DOGG and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DOGG and 1.52% for IPDP.