DOGG vs. EGGQ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) and EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DOGG returned 17.69% vs 54.01% for EGGQ. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. DOGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EGGQ.

Performance

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly lower than EGGQ's 38.62% return.

DOGG

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 6M: 6.18%
• 1Y: 17.69%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EGGQ

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 8.90%
• YTD: 38.62%
• 6M: 35.12%
• 1Y: 54.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	7.26%	19.43%	-0.88%
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	38.62%	25.92%	-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between DOGG and EGGQ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024	-0.09

Return for Risk

DOGG vs. EGGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 49
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

EGGQ

EGGQ Risk / Return Rank: 52
EGGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EGGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EGGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EGGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
EGGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DOGG	EGGQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.60	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.06	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.75	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.75	7.30	-2.55

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the EGGQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOGG and EGGQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum EGGQ drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and EGGQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOGG	EGGQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-22.70%	+11.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-19.76%	+11.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.72%	-7.00%	+1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-5.64%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	7.42%	-3.69%

Volatility

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) is 3.95%, while NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) has a volatility of 15.90%. This indicates that DOGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOGG	EGGQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	15.90%	-11.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	28.25%	-19.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.65%	34.07%	-23.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.96%	34.11%	-21.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.96%	34.11%	-21.15%

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EGGQ's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

DOGG vs. EGGQ - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than EGGQ's 5.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.72%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF	5.51%	5.70%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOGG and EGGQ in my portfolio?

DOGG and EGGQ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DOGG or EGGQ?

EGGQ has higher volatility (15.90%) compared to DOGG (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOGG dropped -11.19% vs EGGQ's -22.70%.

Which ETF is better, DOGG or EGGQ?

On 1-year performance, EGGQ leads with 54.01% vs 17.69% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DOGG or EGGQ?

Over the 1-year period, EGGQ has performed better with a 54.01% return vs 17.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOGG or EGGQ?

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOGG or EGGQ?

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.72%, compared with 5.51% for EGGQ.

What is the main difference between DOGG and EGGQ?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and NestYield. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DOGG and 0.89% for EGGQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DOGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.