DOGG vs. CHAT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest, while CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DOGG returned 11.93%/yr vs 40.54%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

DOGG vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 39.01% return.

DOGG

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 4.34%
• YTD: 11.04%
• 1Y: 22.01%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.23%

CHAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -7.69%
• 6M: 32.64%
• YTD: 39.01%
• 1Y: 68.87%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$58.63M	$57.19M	$67.40M
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	$622.61K	$753.69K	$702.49K

DOGG vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	11.04%	19.43%	-2.58%	16.72%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	39.01%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DOGG and CHAT is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.06

The correlation between DOGG and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DOGG vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 76
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DOGG vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DOGG	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.63	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.08	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.25	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.80	7.96	-2.16

DOGG vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOGG and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOGG	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-31.34%	+20.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-28.34%	+20.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.19%	-31.34%	+20.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-21.25%	+18.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-5.73%	+2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	8.01%	-4.10%

Volatility

DOGG vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) is 5.00%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that DOGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOGG	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	16.74%	-11.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	34.39%	-24.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.50%	39.18%	-27.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	32.41%	-19.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.07%	32.41%	-19.34%

DOGG vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DOGG and CHAT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

DOGG vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, more than CHAT's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.05%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.63%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOGG and CHAT in my portfolio?

DOGG and CHAT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DOGG or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to DOGG (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOGG dropped -11.19% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, DOGG or CHAT?

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 40.54% vs 11.93% for DOGG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DOGG or CHAT?

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 40.54% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOGG or CHAT?

DOGG and CHAT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOGG or CHAT?

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 2.05% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between DOGG and CHAT?

DOGG is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DOGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.