DODGX vs. RUSG.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I (DODGX) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L).

DODGX is managed by Dodge & Cox. It was launched on Jan 4, 1965. RUSG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2011.

Performance

DODGX vs. RUSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I (DODGX) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DODGX vs. RUSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DODGX Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I	-1.65%	13.66%	14.36%	17.49%	-7.25%	31.72%	7.10%	24.30%	-7.15%	18.33%
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	24.09%	43.28%	-30.45%	29.15%	38.14%	35.28%	-2.66%	30.31%

Returns By Period

DODGX

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -1.65%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 8.01%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 12.55%

RUSG.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DODGX vs. RUSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DODGX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than RUSG.L's 0.19% expense ratio.

DODGX

Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I

RUSG.L

Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

DODGX vs. RUSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DODGX

DODGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
DODGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
DODGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
DODGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
DODGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
DODGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DODGX vs. RUSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I (DODGX) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DODGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DODGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between DODGX and RUSG.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DODGX vs. RUSG.L - Dividend Comparison

DODGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, while RUSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DODGX Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I	9.89%	9.86%	8.20%	3.76%	5.47%	3.22%	6.74%	10.23%	9.69%	6.78%	6.26%	5.36%
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DODGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.31%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DODGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.33%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.05%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	—	—