DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L
DOCT.L (L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF) and LDUK.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DOCT.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while LDUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DOCT.L returned -3.81%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for LDUK.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DOCT.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDUK.L.
Performance
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DOCT.L is traded in USD, while LDUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOCT.L achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than LDUK.L's 2.75% return.
DOCT.L
- 1D
- 5.27%
- 1M
- 6.77%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- -3.81%
- 10Y*
- —
LDUK.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCT.L L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF | 0.41% | 24.88% | 1.98% | -1.20% | -33.86% | -2.28% |
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF | 2.75% | 31.88% | 14.20% | 13.93% | -13.46% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOCT.L and LDUK.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between DOCT.L and LDUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOCT.L
LDUK.L
Healthcare
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
DOCT.L
LDUK.L
-
Technology
DOCT.L
LDUK.L
Basic Materials
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
Communication Services
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
Consumer Defensive
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
Energy
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
-
Financial Services
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
Industrials
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
Real Estate
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
-
Utilities
DOCT.L
-
LDUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
DOCT.L
LDUK.L
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCT.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOCT.L | LDUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 0.88 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 3.06 | +1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOCT.L | LDUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 0.69 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.47 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.54 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOCT.L drawdown since its inception was -57.55%, which is greater than LDUK.L's maximum drawdown of -33.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT.L and LDUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOCT.L | LDUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.55% | -33.32% | -24.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | -13.36% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.80% | -15.30% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.82% | -33.32% | -22.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.74% | -2.61% | -27.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.05% | -7.96% | -21.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.04% | 3.84% | +3.20% |
Volatility
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCT.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) at 5.26%. This indicates that DOCT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOCT.L | LDUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 5.26% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | 13.71% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 16.88% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 19.96% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.76% | 19.96% | +4.80% |
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOCT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LDUK.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOCT.L vs. LDUK.L - Dividend Comparison
DOCT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCT.L L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDUK.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF | 4.79% | 4.87% | 4.43% | 5.14% | 5.87% | 4.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOCT.L and LDUK.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDUK.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDUK.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DOCT.L.
DOCT.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while LDUK.L is Europe Equities. DOCT.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while LDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DOCT.L and 0.25% for LDUK.L.
Find the right allocation for DOCT.L and LDUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer