DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCT.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L).
DOCT.L and ROBG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DOCT.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Jun 26, 2019. ROBG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 23, 2014. Both DOCT.L and ROBG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCT.L L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF | -6.39% | 24.88% | 1.98% | -1.20% | -33.86% | 0.19% | 66.94% | 5.40% |
ROBG.L L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF | 2.11% | 23.33% | -1.71% | 24.60% | -33.82% | 15.99% | 45.19% | 5.35% |
Different Trading Currencies
DOCT.L is traded in USD, while ROBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ROBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOCT.L achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than ROBG.L's 2.11% return.
DOCT.L
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- -5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBG.L
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 38.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOCT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBG.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
DOCT.L
ROBG.L
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCT.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOCT.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.57 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 2.18 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 2.27 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 9.17 | -4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOCT.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.57 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.10 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.44 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between DOCT.L and ROBG.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DOCT.L nor ROBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOCT.L drawdown since its inception was -57.55%, which is greater than ROBG.L's maximum drawdown of -43.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT.L and ROBG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOCT.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.55% | -34.50% | -23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | -13.77% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.82% | -34.50% | -21.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.50% | -9.20% | -25.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -10.45% | -18.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 3.58% | +1.54% |
Volatility
DOCT.L vs. ROBG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCT.L) is 7.64%, while L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that DOCT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DOCT.L | ROBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 9.44% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 16.25% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.92% | 24.20% | -2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 22.59% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 21.52% | +3.20% |