DNOPY vs. META
DNOPY (Dino Polska S.A) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. DNOPY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, DNOPY returned 4.36%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for META. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DNOPY vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNOPY achieves a -30.21% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.03% return.
DNOPY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -30.21%
- 6M
- -27.27%
- 1Y
- -40.59%
- 3Y*
- -11.34%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- —
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
DNOPY vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A | -30.21% | 19.79% | -16.65% | 30.68% | 2.43% | 10.75% | 89.61% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 40.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNOPY and META is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
DNOPY:
$7.95B
META:
$1.45T
DNOPY:
PLN 1.59
META:
$27.47
DNOPY:
18.78
META:
20.64
DNOPY:
1.07
META:
0.85
DNOPY:
0.85
META:
6.78
DNOPY:
3.26
META:
5.97
DNOPY:
PLN 34.60B
META:
$214.96B
DNOPY:
PLN 8.12B
META:
$176.14B
DNOPY:
PLN 2.57B
META:
$106.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNOPY vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
DNOPY
META
DNOPY vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DNOPY | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.93 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.54 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | -1.12 | -0.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DNOPY vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNOPY drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOPY and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNOPY | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.35% | -76.74% | +28.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.35% | -33.30% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.35% | -34.15% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.35% | -76.74% | +28.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.50% | -28.06% | -18.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -15.83% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.94% | 16.06% | +10.88% |
Volatility
DNOPY vs. META - Volatility Comparison
Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.17%. This indicates that DNOPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNOPY | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.78% | 10.17% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.91% | 26.91% | +10.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.59% | 35.52% | +8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.31% | 44.04% | +14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.67% | 38.67% | +21.00% |
Dividends
DNOPY vs. META - Dividend Comparison
DNOPY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Financials
DNOPY vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dino Polska S.A and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DNOPY vs. META - Profitability Comparison
DNOPY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 8.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
DNOPY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported an operating income of 419.22M and revenue of 8.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
DNOPY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported a net income of 315.98M and revenue of 8.44B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DNOPY and META have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNOPY has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNOPY dropped -48.35% vs META's -76.74%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNOPY and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer