PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLDX vs. SWMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DNLDX having a 13.68% return and SWMCX slightly higher at 13.97%.


DNLDX

1D
0.69%
1M
3.99%
YTD
13.68%
6M
12.10%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
10.65%

SWMCX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.34%
YTD
13.97%
6M
12.48%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.68%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%-0.14%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
13.97%10.54%15.28%17.20%-17.31%22.55%17.03%30.46%-9.16%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLDX and SWMCX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.98

The correlation between DNLDX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLDX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SWMCX
SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNLDXSWMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.90

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

11.06

+1.28

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the SWMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLDX and SWMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than SWMCX's maximum drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and SWMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLDXSWMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-40.34%

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-8.15%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

-21.07%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-26.09%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-6.60%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.13%

-0.18%

Volatility

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLDXSWMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.42%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

10.48%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

13.85%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

18.31%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

20.62%

-1.07%

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLDX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison

DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.22%, more than SWMCX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.22%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
1.87%2.13%2.60%1.49%1.59%2.93%1.45%2.44%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, DNLDX and SWMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DNLDX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to SWMCX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLDX dropped -63.69% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLDX and SWMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer