DNLDX vs. LLSCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) and LLSCX (Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DNLDX returned 10.01%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for LLSCX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DNLDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LLSCX.

Performance

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -6.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLDX has outperformed LLSCX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while LLSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.72% annualized return.

DNLDX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 21.00%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

LLSCX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: -6.08%
• 6M: -5.80%
• 1Y: -1.64%
• 3Y*: 8.14%
• 5Y*: 0.52%
• 10Y*: 5.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	11.73%	9.79%	22.27%	16.99%	-14.34%	26.49%	9.29%	16.82%	-14.46%	16.64%
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund	-6.08%	7.56%	9.69%	20.17%	-19.25%	11.18%	4.17%	27.74%	-6.52%	9.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLDX and LLSCX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1988	0.73

The correlation between DNLDX and LLSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DNLDX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNLDX

DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 44
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

LLSCX

LLSCX Risk / Return Rank: 2
LLSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LLSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
LLSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
LLSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
LLSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DNLDX	LLSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	-0.09	+1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	-0.04	+2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.00	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	-0.10	+3.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	-0.26	+11.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the LLSCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLDX and LLSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DNLDX	LLSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	-0.09	+1.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.03	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.23	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.51	+0.04

Drawdowns

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, roughly equal to the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and LLSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNLDX	LLSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.69%	-63.97%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.29%	-11.30%	+4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.42%	-15.40%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.42%	-28.37%	+4.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.23%	-42.23%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.22%	+10.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-8.90%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	4.44%	-2.50%

Volatility

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNLDX	LLSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	3.31%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	8.52%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	12.75%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	16.97%	+1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	24.58%	-5.07%

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DNLDX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison

DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.45%, more than LLSCX's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund	13.45%	14.15%	15.24%	1.69%	8.82%	17.74%	2.77%	2.65%	11.14%	11.32%	1.00%	3.12%
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund	1.25%	1.17%	0.11%	0.94%	1.20%	0.82%	5.85%	14.89%	18.13%	8.43%	18.01%	5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNLDX and LLSCX in my portfolio?

DNLDX and LLSCX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DNLDX or LLSCX?

DNLDX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to LLSCX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLDX dropped -63.69% vs LLSCX's -63.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.