DNLDX vs. FTHMX
DNLDX (BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund) and FTHMX (FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, DNLDX returned 21.00% vs 27.99% for FTHMX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DNLDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for FTHMX.
Performance
DNLDX vs. FTHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than FTHMX's 14.83% return.
DNLDX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
FTHMX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DNLDX vs. FTHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 11.73% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 13.70% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 14.83% | 12.89% | 12.48% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNLDX and FTHMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DNLDX and FTHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNLDX vs. FTHMX — Risk / Return Rank
DNLDX
FTHMX
DNLDX vs. FTHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNLDX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 4.69 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | 16.43 | -4.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNLDX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.35 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.31 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
DNLDX vs. FTHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than FTHMX's maximum drawdown of -20.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and FTHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNLDX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -20.45% | -43.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -6.33% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -3.04% | -6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.80% | +0.14% |
Volatility
DNLDX vs. FTHMX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNLDX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 3.45% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 9.36% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 12.65% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 15.43% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 15.43% | +4.08% |
DNLDX vs. FTHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHMX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
DNLDX vs. FTHMX - Dividend Comparison
DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.45%, more than FTHMX's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 13.45% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.28% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DNLDX and FTHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FTHMX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to DNLDX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLDX dropped -63.69% vs FTHMX's -20.45%.
FTHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNLDX and FTHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer