PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLDX vs. DSMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than DSMFX's 15.86% return.


DNLDX

1D
0.37%
1M
0.66%
6M
11.95%
YTD
15.00%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
10.44%

DSMFX

1D
1.47%
1M
-3.21%
6M
9.15%
YTD
15.86%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
15.00%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%10.33%
DSMFX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
15.86%13.94%14.72%11.61%-19.89%26.65%23.63%30.82%-7.68%12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLDX and DSMFX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.92

The correlation between DNLDX and DSMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLDX vs. DSMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DSMFX
DSMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DSMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DSMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNLDXDSMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.16

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

11.18

-1.41

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the DSMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLDX and DSMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than DSMFX's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and DSMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLDXDSMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-42.52%

-21.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-9.75%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

-27.39%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-30.72%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-5.80%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-8.66%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.72%

-0.77%

Volatility

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) is 2.77%, while Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that DNLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLDXDSMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

4.23%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

14.28%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

18.58%

-5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

21.03%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

21.82%

-2.36%

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DSMFX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLDX vs. DSMFX - Dividend Comparison

DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.06%, more than DSMFX's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.06%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
DSMFX
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.16%7.13%7.71%0.26%3.57%27.39%2.06%4.05%5.96%0.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNLDX and DSMFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSMFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DNLDX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLDX dropped -63.69% vs DSMFX's -42.52%.

DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLDX and DSMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer