PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNBBY vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DNB Bank ASA (DNBBY) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNBBY achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 35.66% return.


DNBBY

1D
0.53%
1M
1.83%
YTD
16.41%
6M
22.38%
1Y
19.45%
3Y*
29.36%
5Y*
10Y*

IBKR

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.86%
YTD
35.66%
6M
32.28%
1Y
69.80%
3Y*
63.85%
5Y*
39.30%
10Y*
24.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
16.41%48.33%1.86%15.07%-9.28%9.76%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
35.66%46.37%114.43%15.14%-8.35%23.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DNBBY and IBKR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2021

0.30

The correlation between DNBBY and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DNBBY:

$44.50B

IBKR:

$39.04B

EPS

DNBBY:

$28.64

IBKR:

$3.76

PE Ratio

DNBBY:

1.07

IBKR:

23.18

PEG Ratio

DNBBY:

0.06

IBKR:

0.79

PS Ratio

DNBBY:

0.23

IBKR:

4.47

PB Ratio

DNBBY:

0.15

IBKR:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

DNBBY:

$194.44B

IBKR:

$8.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DNBBY:

$66.77B

IBKR:

$7.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

DNBBY:

$54.84B

IBKR:

$7.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNBBY vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNBBY
DNBBY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DNBBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNBBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNBBY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DNBBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNBBY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DNB Bank ASA (DNBBY) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNBBYIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.75

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

9.52

-5.99

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNBBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNBBY and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNBBYIBKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.88

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.44

+0.14

Drawdowns

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNBBY drawdown since its inception was -34.47%, smaller than the maximum IBKR drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNBBY and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNBBYIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.47%

-63.66%

+29.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-18.70%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-38.66%

+20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-1.87%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-24.73%

+14.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

7.36%

-1.83%

Volatility

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DNB Bank ASA (DNBBY) is 3.89%, while Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) has a volatility of 10.71%. This indicates that DNBBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNBBYIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

10.71%

-6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

27.36%

-12.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

37.35%

-15.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.57%

34.42%

-7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.57%

33.33%

-6.76%

Dividends

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

DNBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than IBKR's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
6.19%5.35%7.71%5.70%5.52%4.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.38%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%

Financials

DNBBY vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DNB Bank ASA and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
45.17B
765.00M
(DNBBY) Total Revenue
(IBKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DNBBY and IBKR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBKR has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to DNBBY (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNBBY dropped -34.47% vs IBKR's -63.66%.

IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNBBY and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer