PortfoliosLab logo
DNBBY vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DNBBY and SMH is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

DNBBY vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DNB Bank ASA (DNBBY) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DNBBY:

1.80

SMH:

-0.01

Sortino Ratio

DNBBY:

2.28

SMH:

0.18

Omega Ratio

DNBBY:

1.35

SMH:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

DNBBY:

2.52

SMH:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

DNBBY:

10.54

SMH:

-0.23

Ulcer Index

DNBBY:

4.43%

SMH:

15.52%

Daily Std Dev

DNBBY:

27.49%

SMH:

43.26%

Max Drawdown

DNBBY:

-55.76%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

DNBBY:

-2.83%

SMH:

-14.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNBBY achieves a 44.71% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's -1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, DNBBY has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 11.49%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.


DNBBY

YTD

44.71%

1M

15.84%

6M

38.53%

1Y

49.09%

3Y*

18.75%

5Y*

23.62%

10Y*

11.49%

SMH

YTD

-1.00%

1M

13.48%

6M

-0.54%

1Y

-0.60%

3Y*

26.07%

5Y*

28.60%

10Y*

24.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DNB Bank ASA

VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DNBBY vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNBBY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DNBBY is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DNBBY is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DNBBY is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DNBBY is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DNBBY is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DNBBY is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DNBBY vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DNB Bank ASA (DNBBY) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DNBBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNBBY and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DNBBY vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

DNBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than SMH's 0.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
5.48%7.68%5.70%5.53%9.03%4.79%5.05%5.63%3.56%3.58%3.86%2.99%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.45%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

DNBBY vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNBBY drawdown since its inception was -55.76%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNBBY and SMH.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DNBBY vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

DNB Bank ASA (DNBBY) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 9.05%. This indicates that DNBBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...