DMO vs. GLBIX
DMO (Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund) and GLBIX (Leuthold Global Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, DMO returned 3.76%/yr vs 6.35%/yr for GLBIX. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DMO charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for GLBIX.
Performance
DMO vs. GLBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMO achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than GLBIX's 12.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DMO has underperformed GLBIX with an annualized return of 3.76%, while GLBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.35% annualized return.
DMO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.28%
GLBIX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 20.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $399.37K | $416.73K | $406.81K | |
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DMO vs. GLBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMO Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund | 1.66% | 6.95% | 20.24% | 16.79% | -21.64% | 17.12% | -22.32% | 9.10% | -2.04% | 23.46% |
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund | 12.71% | 17.72% | 1.08% | 8.32% | -7.91% | 15.01% | 7.52% | 9.36% | -12.85% | 16.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMO and GLBIX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2010 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMO vs. GLBIX — Risk / Return Rank
DMO
GLBIX
DMO vs. GLBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund (DMO) and Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DMO | GLBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 3.38 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 10.93 | -11.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DMO vs. GLBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMO drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, which is greater than GLBIX's maximum drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMO and GLBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMO | GLBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.16% | -26.82% | -22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -6.39% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.04% | -6.39% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.04% | -16.14% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.16% | -26.82% | -22.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -2.65% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -4.84% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 1.97% | +1.63% |
Volatility
DMO vs. GLBIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund (DMO) is 1.57%, while Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that DMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMO | GLBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 3.57% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.77% | 8.62% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 9.87% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 9.28% | +3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 9.60% | +10.32% |
DMO vs. GLBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GLBIX's 1.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMO vs. GLBIX - Dividend Comparison
DMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.22%, more than GLBIX's 8.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMO Dimensional Multi-Asset Fund | 14.22% | 14.01% | 12.92% | 11.46% | 11.51% | 8.88% | 10.95% | 9.63% | 18.93% | 13.30% | 13.19% | 14.09% |
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund | 8.62% | 9.71% | 8.31% | 2.52% | 5.18% | 1.89% | 0.25% | 1.04% | 8.48% | 9.31% | 9.66% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMO and GLBIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLBIX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to DMO (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMO dropped -49.16% vs GLBIX's -26.82%.
GLBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMO and GLBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer