DMCVX vs. DSMFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DMCVX (BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund) and DSMFX (Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DMCVX returned 7.84%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for DSMFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMCVX charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for DSMFX.

Performance

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund (DMCVX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMCVX achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly lower than DSMFX's 20.55% return.

DMCVX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 10.50%
• 1Y: 21.93%
• 3Y*: 14.05%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

DSMFX

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 20.55%
• 6M: 17.59%
• 1Y: 42.99%
• 3Y*: 18.91%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DMCVX BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund	11.90%	10.30%	10.50%	12.35%	-8.24%	15.84%	18.81%	27.49%	-18.12%	5.54%
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund	20.55%	13.94%	14.72%	11.61%	-19.89%	26.65%	23.63%	30.82%	-7.68%	12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DMCVX and DSMFX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017	0.90

The correlation between DMCVX and DSMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DMCVX vs. DSMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMCVX

DMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 37
DMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
DMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
DMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

DSMFX

DSMFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
DSMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DSMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DSMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DSMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DSMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund (DMCVX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DMCVX	DSMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.43	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.31	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.41	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	4.56	-2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	17.94	-8.92

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the DSMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMCVX and DSMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMCVX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than DSMFX's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMCVX and DSMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMCVX	DSMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.31%	-42.52%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-9.75%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.13%	-27.39%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.13%	-30.72%	+9.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	0.00%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-8.72%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.45%	-0.01%

Volatility

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund (DMCVX) is 5.15%, while Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that DMCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMCVX	DSMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.15%	6.68%	-1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.06%	14.42%	-3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.40%	18.28%	-3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	21.08%	-3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.54%	21.88%	-2.34%

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMCVX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DSMFX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMCVX vs. DSMFX - Dividend Comparison

DMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.30%, more than DSMFX's 5.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMCVX BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund	12.30%	13.77%	10.02%	3.94%	6.55%	12.80%	0.10%	0.26%	33.11%	9.62%	4.60%	20.93%
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund	5.92%	7.13%	7.71%	0.26%	3.57%	27.39%	2.06%	4.05%	5.96%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMCVX and DSMFX in my portfolio?

DMCVX and DSMFX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMCVX or DSMFX?

DSMFX has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to DMCVX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMCVX dropped -58.31% vs DSMFX's -42.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.