DMCVX vs. BTMFX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DMCVX (BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund) and BTMFX (Boston Trust Midcap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DMCVX returned 10.21%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for BTMFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMCVX charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BTMFX.

Performance

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund (DMCVX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMCVX achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 1.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DMCVX having a 10.21% annualized return and BTMFX not far ahead at 10.40%.

DMCVX

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 19.63%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

BTMFX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: 9.01%
• 5Y*: 5.81%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DMCVX BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund	11.18%	10.30%	10.50%	12.35%	-8.24%	15.84%	18.81%	27.49%	-18.12%	11.73%
BTMFX Boston Trust Midcap Fund	1.96%	4.29%	10.27%	13.06%	-10.91%	24.77%	9.72%	33.00%	-3.36%	20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DMCVX and BTMFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007	0.91

The correlation between DMCVX and BTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DMCVX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMCVX

DMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 37
DMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
DMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
DMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
DMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BTMFX

BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund (DMCVX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DMCVX	BTMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.52	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	0.86	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.10	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	0.79	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	2.18	+6.24

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMCVX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMCVX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than BTMFX's maximum drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMCVX and BTMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMCVX	BTMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.31%	-49.26%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-7.79%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.13%	-17.77%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.13%	-20.79%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	-37.14%	-3.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-2.50%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-6.15%	-2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.84%	-0.40%

Volatility

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund (DMCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) at 3.14%. This indicates that DMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMCVX	BTMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	3.14%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	8.18%	+2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.47%	11.90%	+2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	15.75%	+1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.47%	17.40%	+2.07%

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMCVX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMCVX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

DMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.38%, more than BTMFX's 10.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTMFX Boston Trust Midcap Fund	10.65%	10.86%	4.23%	4.41%	4.71%	4.91%	1.98%	6.95%	5.96%	6.61%	7.03%	6.60%
DMCVX BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value Fund	12.38%	13.77%	10.02%	3.94%	6.55%	12.80%	0.10%	0.26%	33.11%	9.62%	4.60%	20.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMCVX and BTMFX in my portfolio?

DMCVX and BTMFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMCVX or BTMFX?

DMCVX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to BTMFX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMCVX dropped -58.31% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.