DMCRX vs. RFIMX
DMCRX (Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund) and RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DMCRX returned 11.23%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for RFIMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMCRX charges 1.38%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for RFIMX.
Performance
DMCRX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMCRX achieves a 25.51% return, which is significantly higher than RFIMX's 15.87% return.
DMCRX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 25.51%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 79.70%
- 3Y*
- 30.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.23%
- 10Y*
- 22.52%
RFIMX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 15.87%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
DMCRX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 25.51% | 31.17% | 30.58% | 11.47% | -33.54% | 22.23% | 86.43% | 34.03% | -1.63% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 15.87% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMCRX and RFIMX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DMCRX and RFIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMCRX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank
DMCRX
RFIMX
DMCRX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMCRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.90 | 1.53 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.41 | 2.23 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | 3.20 | +2.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.94 | 9.02 | +9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMCRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | 1.53 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.00 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.00 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
DMCRX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMCRX drawdown since its inception was -59.16%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMCRX and RFIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMCRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.16% | -99.41% | +40.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.46% | -9.11% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.92% | -99.41% | +64.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.16% | -99.41% | +40.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -99.12% | +97.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.10% | -29.26% | +9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 3.23% | +1.11% |
Volatility
DMCRX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) at 5.79%. This indicates that DMCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMCRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.30% | 5.79% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.07% | 13.68% | +7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.46% | 19.11% | +9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.48% | 5,369.96% | -5,330.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.98% | 4,402.70% | -4,368.72% |
DMCRX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMCRX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMCRX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison
DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.93%, more than RFIMX's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 10.93% | 13.72% | 3.86% | 0.87% | 8.20% | 48.23% | 19.79% | 14.70% | 33.22% | 8.91% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.14% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMCRX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMCRX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to RFIMX (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMCRX dropped -59.16% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.
DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMCRX and RFIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer