PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMBS vs. IBGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMBS vs. IBGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than IBGA's 0.04% return.


DMBS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.96%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
10Y*

IBGA

1D
0.18%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMBS vs. IBGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
0.71%8.54%2.59%
IBGA
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF
0.04%6.09%-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DMBS and IBGA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024

0.91

The correlation between DMBS and IBGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMBS vs. IBGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IBGA
IBGA Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGA Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMBS vs. IBGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMBSIBGADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

0.68

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

1.03

+1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.12

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.75

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.60

2.07

+5.53

DMBS vs. IBGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the IBGA Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMBS and IBGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMBSIBGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.68

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.24

+0.40

Drawdowns

DMBS vs. IBGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum IBGA drawdown of -11.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and IBGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMBSIBGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-11.69%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-6.60%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-4.27%

+2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-5.05%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

2.38%

-1.48%

Volatility

DMBS vs. IBGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) is 1.63%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that DMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMBSIBGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

2.64%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

5.76%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

8.22%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

9.87%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

9.87%

-3.59%

DMBS vs. IBGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBGA's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMBS vs. IBGA - Dividend Comparison

DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than IBGA's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.11%4.96%4.97%2.82%
IBGA
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF
4.64%4.49%2.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMBS and IBGA have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBGA has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to DMBS (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs IBGA's -11.69%.

On 1-year performance, DMBS leads with 7.09% vs 5.54% for IBGA. On fees, IBGA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBGA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.64% for IBGA.

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 0.07% for IBGA.

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMBS and IBGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer