DMBS vs. BAMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DMBS (Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF) and BAMB (Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DMBS returned 6.86% vs 2.78% for BAMB. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMBS charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMB.

Performance

DMBS vs. BAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than BAMB's -0.85% return.

DMBS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.61%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMBS vs. BAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF	0.51%	8.54%	2.09%	7.00%
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	-0.85%	6.15%	3.01%	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DMBS and BAMB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.88

The correlation between DMBS and BAMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DMBS vs. BAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMBS

DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 48
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 48
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

BAMB

BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 21
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMBS vs. BAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMBS	BAMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	0.72	+0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	1.08	+1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.12	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	0.83	+1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	2.43	+5.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMBS vs. BAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the BAMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMBS and BAMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMBS	BAMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	0.72	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	1.03	-0.41

Drawdowns

DMBS vs. BAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, which is greater than BAMB's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and BAMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMBS	BAMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-4.48%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.20%	-3.37%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-2.51%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-1.01%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	1.15%	-0.25%

Volatility

DMBS vs. BAMB - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) at 1.18%. This indicates that DMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMBS	BAMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	1.18%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.02%	2.72%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.18%	3.90%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.28%	4.06%	+2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.28%	4.06%	+2.22%

DMBS vs. BAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMB's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMBS vs. BAMB - Dividend Comparison

DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than BAMB's 2.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	2.95%	2.85%	2.90%	0.73%
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF	5.12%	4.96%	4.97%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMBS and BAMB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DMBS and BAMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DMBS or BAMB?

DMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to BAMB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs BAMB's -4.48%.

Which ETF is better, DMBS or BAMB?

On 1-year performance, DMBS leads with 6.86% vs 2.78% for BAMB. On fees, DMBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BAMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DMBS or BAMB?

Over the 1-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMBS or BAMB?

DMBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMBS or BAMB?

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 2.95% for BAMB.

What is the main difference between DMBS and BAMB?

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 1.09% for BAMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.