DMAY vs. OILK
DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DMAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMAY returned 7.16%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
DMAY vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | 39.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAY and OILK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.12 |
The correlation between DMAY and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DMAY vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMAY
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
DMAY
OILK
-
Financial Services
DMAY
OILK
-
Communication Services
DMAY
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
DMAY
OILK
Healthcare
DMAY
OILK
-
Industrials
DMAY
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
DMAY
OILK
-
Energy
DMAY
OILK
-
Utilities
DMAY
OILK
-
Real Estate
DMAY
OILK
-
Basic Materials
DMAY
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMAY vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
DMAY
OILK
DMAY vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.34 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 3.42 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.76 | 6.91 | +15.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.06 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.59 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.12 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
DMAY vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -83.76% | +69.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -17.35% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.38% | -23.42% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.90% | -34.69% | +20.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -3.66% | +3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -32.61% | +30.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 8.56% | -8.01% |
Volatility
DMAY vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 0.84%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMAY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 10.44% | -9.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.74% | 23.26% | -19.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.73% | 28.75% | -24.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 30.12% | -21.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 35.97% | -27.54% |
DMAY vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMAY vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMAY and OILK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
DMAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.68% for OILK.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMAY and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer