DMAY vs. DUHP
DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) and DUHP (DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DMAY is passively managed, while DUHP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DMAY returned 11.27%/yr vs 17.83%/yr for DUHP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DUHP.
Performance
DMAY vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than DUHP's 7.22% return.
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
DUHP
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY vs. DUHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 3.36% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -6.88% |
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF | 7.22% | 13.77% | 19.49% | 21.11% | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAY and DUHP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DMAY and DUHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
DMAY vs. DUHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMAY
DUHP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
DMAY
DUHP
Financial Services
DMAY
DUHP
Communication Services
DMAY
DUHP
Consumer Cyclical
DMAY
DUHP
Healthcare
DMAY
DUHP
Industrials
DMAY
DUHP
Consumer Defensive
DMAY
DUHP
Energy
DMAY
DUHP
Utilities
DMAY
DUHP
Real Estate
DMAY
DUHP
-
Basic Materials
DMAY
DUHP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMAY vs. DUHP — Risk / Return Rank
DMAY
DUHP
DMAY vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DMAY | DUHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.04 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.05 | 8.82 | +9.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DMAY vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum DUHP drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and DUHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAY | DUHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -20.05% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -8.99% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.38% | -17.86% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -2.47% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -4.00% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 2.08% | -1.48% |
Volatility
DMAY vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 2.26%, while DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMAY | DUHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 4.83% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.30% | 9.62% | -5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.09% | 11.87% | -6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.07% | 16.32% | -7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 16.32% | -7.89% |
DMAY vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMAY vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison
DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF | 0.99% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.51% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMAY and DUHP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUHP has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to DMAY (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs DUHP's -20.05%.
On 3-year performance, DUHP leads with 17.83% vs 11.27% for DMAY. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DUHP has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
DUHP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.21% for DUHP.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMAY and DUHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer