PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAY vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAY vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.


DMAY

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.30%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.19%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAY vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DMAY and BUFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAY vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAY vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMAYBUFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.76

DMAY vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMAYBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

2.68

-1.81

Drawdowns

DMAY vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAYBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-2.87%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.07%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-0.24%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

DMAY vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAYBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

3.98%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

3.98%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

3.98%

+4.45%

DMAY vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAY vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither DMAY nor BUFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAY and BUFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

DMAY and BUFX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DMAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAY and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer