DMAY vs. ABFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) and ABFL (Abacus FCF Leaders ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DMAY is passively managed, while ABFL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMAY returned 7.16%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for ABFL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ABFL.

Performance

DMAY vs. ABFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than ABFL's 17.63% return.

DMAY

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 12.37%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: —

ABFL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 6.04%
• YTD: 17.63%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAY vs. ABFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	4.42%	11.05%	12.82%	15.40%	-9.98%	6.14%	6.40%
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	17.63%	8.07%	18.26%	22.97%	-14.60%	30.66%	29.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAY and ABFL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020	0.84

The correlation between DMAY and ABFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DMAY vs. ABFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DMAY	ABFL
Technology	36.2%	35.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	2.8%
Communication Services	10.9%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	6.3%
Healthcare	8.4%	12.5%
Industrials	8.1%	20.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.3%
Energy	3.5%	7.9%
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.3%

Return for Risk

DMAY vs. ABFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAY

DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 85
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

ABFL

ABFL Risk / Return Rank: 45
ABFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ABFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ABFL Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ABFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ABFL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAY vs. ABFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMAY	ABFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	1.36	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	1.91	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.24	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	2.90	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.76	9.41	+13.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMAY vs. ABFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the ABFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAY and ABFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMAY	ABFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	1.36	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.75	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.79	+0.09

Drawdowns

DMAY vs. ABFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum ABFL drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and ABFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMAY	ABFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-34.95%	+21.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-7.17%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.38%	-19.92%	+7.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.90%	-21.88%	+7.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	0.00%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-4.99%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	2.21%	-1.66%

Volatility

DMAY vs. ABFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 0.84%, while Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMAY	ABFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	4.48%	-3.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.74%	11.70%	-7.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.73%	15.31%	-10.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.02%	17.09%	-8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.43%	18.71%	-10.28%

DMAY vs. ABFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ABFL's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMAY vs. ABFL - Dividend Comparison

DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	0.53%	0.62%	0.70%	0.94%	1.36%	9.63%	0.41%	0.72%	0.62%	0.40%
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMAY and ABFL in my portfolio?

DMAY and ABFL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMAY or ABFL?

ABFL has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs ABFL's -34.95%.

Which ETF is better, DMAY or ABFL?

On 5-year performance, ABFL leads with 12.77% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, ABFL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DMAY or ABFL?

Over the 5-year period, ABFL has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMAY or ABFL?

ABFL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMAY or ABFL?

ABFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

What is the main difference between DMAY and ABFL?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.49% for ABFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.