PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAX vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAX vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAX achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.51% return.


DMAX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.73%
6M
2.85%
YTD
3.26%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.83%

WNTR

1D
-0.22%
1M
7.89%
6M
8.31%
YTD
10.51%
1Y
106.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$141.18K$285.57K$283.69K
$3.92M$3.66M$3.95M

DMAX vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DMAX and WNTR is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAX vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DMAX vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMAXWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.30

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

2.52

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.29

6.38

+19.92

DMAX vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAX and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMAX vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAX drawdown since its inception was -3.37%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAX and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAXWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-42.65%

+39.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-42.65%

+41.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.84%

+9.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-20.15%

+19.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

16.83%

-16.54%

Volatility

DMAX vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) is 0.60%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that DMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAXWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

13.00%

-12.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

47.22%

-45.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30%

54.66%

-52.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

53.34%

-50.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.30%

53.34%

-50.04%

DMAX vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAX vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than WNTR's 107.26% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DMAX and WNTR have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to DMAX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAX dropped -3.37% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.92% vs 7.49% for DMAX. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.92% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.26%, compared with 1.14% for DMAX.

DMAX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DMAX and 1.00% for WNTR.

DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAX and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer