DMAR vs. TLTW
DMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March) and TLTW (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. DMAR is actively managed, while TLTW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DMAR returned 12.11%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for TLTW. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TLTW.
Performance
DMAR vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 1.21% return.
DMAR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
TLTW
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 0.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAR vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 7.21% | 9.13% | 12.74% | 12.25% | -2.86% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 1.21% | 11.36% | -2.18% | 0.73% | -11.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAR and TLTW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMAR vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank
DMAR
TLTW
DMAR vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.04 | 1.24 | +0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.68 | 1.76 | +7.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 62.37 | 5.28 | +57.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07 | 1.37 | +2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | -0.03 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
DMAR vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and TLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -18.61% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.53% | -5.97% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.16% | -17.19% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -3.20% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -8.25% | +6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 1.99% | -1.75% |
Volatility
DMAR vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) is 0.67%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that DMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 2.48% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 5.79% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 7.70% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 11.39% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 11.39% | -4.42% |
DMAR vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMAR vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison
DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 11.76% | 14.82% | 14.47% | 19.59% | 8.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMAR and TLTW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLTW has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to DMAR (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAR dropped -9.84% vs TLTW's -18.61%.
On 3-year performance, DMAR leads with 12.11% vs 0.74% for TLTW. On fees, TLTW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DMAR has performed better with a 12.11% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAR.
TLTW has the higher dividend yield at 11.76%, compared with 0.00% for DMAR.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAR and 0.35% for TLTW.
DMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.07 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMAR and TLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer