PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAR vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DMAR vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DMAR vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
1.79%9.13%12.74%8.68%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
-1.61%27.38%114.23%42.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than NVDY's -1.61% return.


DMAR

1D
1.41%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.79%
6M
4.00%
1Y
12.53%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*

NVDY

1D
4.85%
1M
1.16%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
0.55%
1Y
54.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DMAR vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DMAR vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAR vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMARNVDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.68

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.45

2.23

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.30

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.86

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.69

10.05

+3.63

DMAR vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAR and NVDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMARNVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

1.53

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between DMAR and NVDY is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DMAR vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 72.79%.


TTM202520242023
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
72.79%83.10%83.65%22.32%

Drawdowns

DMAR vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and NVDY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DMARNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-34.08%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-13.77%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-7.88%

+7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-6.31%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

5.28%

-4.35%

Volatility

DMAR vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) is 1.94%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.10%. This indicates that DMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DMARNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

9.10%

-7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

21.65%

-18.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.59%

32.45%

-24.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

38.77%

-31.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.05%

38.77%

-31.72%